Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Project Heretica"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Advice)
 
m
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
What you have here shouldn't really be a category. Instead, it should be a [[3.5e Sourcebooks|saucebook]]. - [[User:MisterSinister|MisterSinister]] 21:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 
What you have here shouldn't really be a category. Instead, it should be a [[3.5e Sourcebooks|saucebook]]. - [[User:MisterSinister|MisterSinister]] 21:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Or both. Cats are useful to tying sourcebook content together. Sourcebooks are useful for tying the content together with words and concepts and silly things. - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup>  22:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
::Point taken, Tarkis - I did that myself with Liber Demonica, and seemingly conveniently forgot. - [[User:MisterSinister|MisterSinister]] 22:51, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
:::Hmm, sourcebook? Didn't really thought of it, given that it's a small subset of the much larger project of retooling all classes under Wizard level to reach at least Rogue level, or add things that might reinforce their standing as part of Rogue levels, which definitely CAN be a sourcebook. Still, I'll consider moving the intro to the proper sawzebux format and make it cleaner. [[User:T.G. Oskar|T.G. Oskar]] 05:59, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
::::If you need help with that, you can ask me - I've done it a few times. - [[User:MisterSinister|MisterSinister]] 12:34, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:34, 8 June 2012

A Friendly Suggestion[edit]

What you have here shouldn't really be a category. Instead, it should be a saucebook. - MisterSinister 21:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Or both. Cats are useful to tying sourcebook content together. Sourcebooks are useful for tying the content together with words and concepts and silly things. - Tarkisflux Talk 22:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Point taken, Tarkis - I did that myself with Liber Demonica, and seemingly conveniently forgot. - MisterSinister 22:51, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Hmm, sourcebook? Didn't really thought of it, given that it's a small subset of the much larger project of retooling all classes under Wizard level to reach at least Rogue level, or add things that might reinforce their standing as part of Rogue levels, which definitely CAN be a sourcebook. Still, I'll consider moving the intro to the proper sawzebux format and make it cleaner. T.G. Oskar 05:59, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
If you need help with that, you can ask me - I've done it a few times. - MisterSinister 12:34, 8 June 2012 (UTC)