Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scoundrel (3.5e Class)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Swordsage recovery, really?) |
(→Swordsage recovery, really?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I fail to understand why you use the worst form of recovery in existence for this class, considering that this class can't even mitigate for it using Adaptive Style due to its prerequisites. Please change it to hard-wire the benefits of Adaptive Style into this class' recovery. For the children. - [[User:MisterSinister|MisterSinister]] 19:53, 26 April 2011 (UTC) | I fail to understand why you use the worst form of recovery in existence for this class, considering that this class can't even mitigate for it using Adaptive Style due to its prerequisites. Please change it to hard-wire the benefits of Adaptive Style into this class' recovery. For the children. - [[User:MisterSinister|MisterSinister]] 19:53, 26 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Already spoke to you this in chat, but for general FYI... I actually dislike the swordsage mechanic and often houserule or handwave it elsewhere. But since my games =/= other games I stuck with the WotC method. Anyway I'll slip it into the adaptive section. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] 20:33, 26 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:33, 26 April 2011
Swordsage recovery, really?
I fail to understand why you use the worst form of recovery in existence for this class, considering that this class can't even mitigate for it using Adaptive Style due to its prerequisites. Please change it to hard-wire the benefits of Adaptive Style into this class' recovery. For the children. - MisterSinister 19:53, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
- Already spoke to you this in chat, but for general FYI... I actually dislike the swordsage mechanic and often houserule or handwave it elsewhere. But since my games =/= other games I stuck with the WotC method. Anyway I'll slip it into the adaptive section. -- Eiji-kun 20:33, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
